The United Nations warned the Trump administration earlier this year that repealing ObamaCare without providing an adequate replacement would be a violation of multiple international laws, according to a new report.
Though the Trump administration is likely to ignore the U.N. warning, The Washington Post reported the Office of the U.N. High Commission on Human Rights in Geneva sent an "urgent appeal" on Feb 2.
The Post reported that the confidential, five-page memo cautioned that the repeal of the Affordable Care Act would put the U.S. “at odds with its international obligations.”
The warning was sent to the State Department and reportedly said the U.N. expressed “serious concern” about the prospective loss of health coverage for 30 million people, that in turn could violate “the right to social security of the people in the United States.”
Congressional Republicans failed in March to pass an ObamaCare replacement bill. A new proposal is emerging on Capitol Hill, but it's unclear when it might be considered and how sweeping it may be.
A spokesman for the U.N.’s human rights office in Geneva confirmed the authenticity of the letter, which was sent by Dainius Puras, a Lithuanian doctor who serves the U.N. as “Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.”
Xabier Celaya, a spokesman for the U.N., said Puras cannot comment on his ObamaCare letter until it becomes public in June.
Though the report calls out the Trump administration, there’s very little the U.N. can actually do.
According to the report, the letter sent to the Trump administration also was supposed to be shared with the majority and minority leaders in both houses of Congress -- but that did not happen.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s office and Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer’s office said they never received the letter, as did officials in House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s office. The letter from Puras did make its way to the Department of Health and Human Services, where an unnamed employee supposedly leaked it.
Wednesday, April 26, 2017
Thailand Facebook Live killing: Mum doesn't blame social media site for daughter's murder
The wife of a man in Thailand who filmed himself killing his 11-month-old daughter live on Facebook has said she bears no anger towards the social media site or the users who shared the videos.
The disturbing footage showed her husband Wuttisan Wongtalay tying a rope around his daughter's neck before dropping her from the roof of a building in Phuket.
His body was found next to his baby but his suicide was not broadcast.
Two video clips showing the child's murder were accessible on his Facebook page for around 24 hours before they were taken down.
Thai police said Wongtalay was paranoid about his wife leaving him.
Local television images later showed the child's mother, 21-year-old Chiranut Trairat, in tears as she held her dead baby girl in her arms.
"I am not angry at Facebook or blaming them on this," she told the Associated Press on Wednesday.
Two video clips showing the child's murder were accessible on his Facebook page for around 24 hours before they were taken down.
Thai police said Wongtalay was paranoid about his wife leaving him.
Local television images later showed the child's mother, 21-year-old Chiranut Trairat, in tears as she held her dead baby girl in her arms.
"I am not angry at Facebook or blaming them on this," she told the Associated Press on Wednesday.
The disturbing footage showed her husband Wuttisan Wongtalay tying a rope around his daughter's neck before dropping her from the roof of a building in Phuket.
His body was found next to his baby but his suicide was not broadcast.
Two video clips showing the child's murder were accessible on his Facebook page for around 24 hours before they were taken down.
Thai police said Wongtalay was paranoid about his wife leaving him.
Local television images later showed the child's mother, 21-year-old Chiranut Trairat, in tears as she held her dead baby girl in her arms.
"I am not angry at Facebook or blaming them on this," she told the Associated Press on Wednesday.
Two video clips showing the child's murder were accessible on his Facebook page for around 24 hours before they were taken down.
Thai police said Wongtalay was paranoid about his wife leaving him.
Local television images later showed the child's mother, 21-year-old Chiranut Trairat, in tears as she held her dead baby girl in her arms.
"I am not angry at Facebook or blaming them on this," she told the Associated Press on Wednesday.
Alice Ruggles murder: Soldier Trimaan 'Harry' Dhillon jailed for 22 years
A soldier who stalked his ex-girlfriend before cutting her throat from ear to ear has been jailed for 22 years after being found guilty of her murder.
Lance Corporal Trimaan "Harry" Dhillon left Alice Ruggles to bleed to death on her bathroom floor after breaking into her flat in Gateshead and slashing her neck.
He fled without calling 999 but remembered to take her phone and the murder weapon.
The 26-year-old had denied the killing, saying it was Miss Ruggles who had attacked him with a knife, accidentally stabbing herself in the process.
However, a jury at Newcastle Crown Court took less than two hours to dismiss his story.
The court heard that Miss Ruggles, 24, had been terrified of her former partner, and had received an official police warning to stop him from contacting her.
However, the Special Forces hopeful ignored it, driving from his Edinburgh barracks to Gateshead to kill her in October.
Sentencing Dhillon to life with a minimum of 22 years, Judge Paul Sloan said the murder was an act of "utter barbarism".
He said: "Not a shred of remorse have you shown from first to last - indeed you were concentrating so hard on getting your story right when giving evidence you forgot even to shed a crocodile tear."
Miss Ruggles, from Leicestershire, had met Dhillon online, while he was serving in Afghanistan.
When she ended the relationship in August last year he became obsessive, hacking into her Facebook account and sending her pleading messages.
He continued even after the police order, the court heard.
When Miss Ruggles contacted police again, they asked if she wanted him to be arrested but she declined. However, she later told a friend she felt she had been "palmed off", and told her sister that the police would only "respond when he stabs me".
Following her murder, Dhillon initially denied being at her flat altogether, but was forced to change his account after Miss Ruggles' blood was found on his Help for Heroes wristband and in his BMW.
He then claimed that she had attacked him.
Miss Ruggles suffered 24 injuries while Dhillon, who was almost a foot taller and three stone heavier, escaped unharmed.
The jury was played a harrowing 999 call from Miss Ruggles' flatmate, Maxine McGill, who discovered her body.
Miss McGill named Dhillon as the culprit in the emergency call, and he was arrested at his barracks that evening.
Lance Corporal Trimaan "Harry" Dhillon left Alice Ruggles to bleed to death on her bathroom floor after breaking into her flat in Gateshead and slashing her neck.
He fled without calling 999 but remembered to take her phone and the murder weapon.
The 26-year-old had denied the killing, saying it was Miss Ruggles who had attacked him with a knife, accidentally stabbing herself in the process.
However, a jury at Newcastle Crown Court took less than two hours to dismiss his story.
The court heard that Miss Ruggles, 24, had been terrified of her former partner, and had received an official police warning to stop him from contacting her.
However, the Special Forces hopeful ignored it, driving from his Edinburgh barracks to Gateshead to kill her in October.
Sentencing Dhillon to life with a minimum of 22 years, Judge Paul Sloan said the murder was an act of "utter barbarism".
He said: "Not a shred of remorse have you shown from first to last - indeed you were concentrating so hard on getting your story right when giving evidence you forgot even to shed a crocodile tear."
Miss Ruggles, from Leicestershire, had met Dhillon online, while he was serving in Afghanistan.
When she ended the relationship in August last year he became obsessive, hacking into her Facebook account and sending her pleading messages.
He continued even after the police order, the court heard.
When Miss Ruggles contacted police again, they asked if she wanted him to be arrested but she declined. However, she later told a friend she felt she had been "palmed off", and told her sister that the police would only "respond when he stabs me".
Following her murder, Dhillon initially denied being at her flat altogether, but was forced to change his account after Miss Ruggles' blood was found on his Help for Heroes wristband and in his BMW.
He then claimed that she had attacked him.
Miss Ruggles suffered 24 injuries while Dhillon, who was almost a foot taller and three stone heavier, escaped unharmed.
The jury was played a harrowing 999 call from Miss Ruggles' flatmate, Maxine McGill, who discovered her body.
Miss McGill named Dhillon as the culprit in the emergency call, and he was arrested at his barracks that evening.
'Muddy' men's jeans on sale for £330 at Nordstrom in US
US clothing chain Nordstrom has launched a line of 'dirty' jeans which come with a 'crackled, caked-on muddy coating'.
The new product is apparently aimed at those with plenty of cash, as the retailer pockets a cool $425 (£330) for each pair.
The firm's website describes the jeans as typifying 'rugged, Americana workwear' and 'hard-working action... that shows you're not afraid to get down and dirty'.
Some reviewers, however, have not given them a clean bill of health, including the host of TV show Dirty Jobs, Mike Rowe.
"Finally - a pair of jeans that look like they have been worn by someone with a dirty job… made for people who don't. And you can have your very own pair for just $425," Rowe wrote in a Facebook post that was shared thousands of times.
"The Barracuda Straight Leg Jeans aren't pants. They're not even fashion. They're a costume for wealthy people who see work as ironic - not iconic."
Another review wrote: "This is a joke, right? Do you also sell jeans covered in cow manure? Oh, that must be the deluxe model."
But not everyone was so dismissive.
"What's the beef about buying mud jeans?" one commentator said on Twitter. "If someone can afford $400 for a pair of dirty jeans, so what? Go for it!"
The chain is no stranger to pushing fashion boundaries, launching jeans with 'knee windows' last month - but for a far cheaper $95 (£74).
If you fancy giving the idea a leg-up by investing in a pair, beware of the strict cleaning instructions - machine wash cold, line dry only.
The new product is apparently aimed at those with plenty of cash, as the retailer pockets a cool $425 (£330) for each pair.
The firm's website describes the jeans as typifying 'rugged, Americana workwear' and 'hard-working action... that shows you're not afraid to get down and dirty'.
Some reviewers, however, have not given them a clean bill of health, including the host of TV show Dirty Jobs, Mike Rowe.
"Finally - a pair of jeans that look like they have been worn by someone with a dirty job… made for people who don't. And you can have your very own pair for just $425," Rowe wrote in a Facebook post that was shared thousands of times.
"The Barracuda Straight Leg Jeans aren't pants. They're not even fashion. They're a costume for wealthy people who see work as ironic - not iconic."
Another review wrote: "This is a joke, right? Do you also sell jeans covered in cow manure? Oh, that must be the deluxe model."
But not everyone was so dismissive.
"What's the beef about buying mud jeans?" one commentator said on Twitter. "If someone can afford $400 for a pair of dirty jeans, so what? Go for it!"
The chain is no stranger to pushing fashion boundaries, launching jeans with 'knee windows' last month - but for a far cheaper $95 (£74).
If you fancy giving the idea a leg-up by investing in a pair, beware of the strict cleaning instructions - machine wash cold, line dry only.
British Islamic State terrorist killed by drone 'posed serious threat'
A British terrorist killed by a drone strike in Syria "posed a very serious threat to the UK" and was a "prolific recruiter and attack planner" for the Islamic State group.
Reyaad Khan, along with another Briton, Junaid Hussain, "encouraged multiple operatives around the world to conduct attacks against the UK and our allies," Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) concluded.
The assessment was based on 25 intelligence reports provided to the committee and two formal intelligence assessments carried out by MI5, MI6 and GCHQ.
Khan was killed by a British drone on 21 August 2015 near Raqqa. Two other men died in the strike, one of them, Ruhul Amin, was also British.
The strike was exceptional because it was the first time the UK had carried out a lethal drone strike outside of a military campaign. At the time Parliament had not voted and approved British airstrikes in Syria.
"It was a highly specific, targeted operation," chair of the committee Dominic Grieve MP said.
Three days later, Khan's close associate Hussain was targeted and killed by an American drone.
In evidence given to the Committee, an unnamed intelligence officer said the strikes made the UK safer.
"We have not seen anywhere near the pace of operational activity that we saw from Khan and Hussein," the intelligence officer said.
"I would describe the effect of the disruption as being immediate and serious on the network."
Khan was judged to have the ability to orchestrate and incite attacks "within a short period of time" - although it is not thought the drone strike was ordered in relation to a specific attack.
The committee did not seek to make a judgement on the legality of the strikes.
But a crucial document was withheld by the Prime Minister. This was "profoundly disappointing", Mr Grieve said, and meant the Committee was unable to conclude whether or not the strike was proportional and necessary.
The intelligence agencies provided evidence showing they considered other options to "disrupt" Khan's planning but concluded he was unlikely to travel outside IS-controlled territory and would not be dissuaded from his terrorist activities.
"The threat he posed was ongoing and there appears to have been no realistic prospect of it diminishing."
Although the intelligence agencies did not fear Khan would carry out an attack himself, MI5 feared he might contribute to a terrorist plot that might be missed "due to gaps in coverage".
The report has been heavily redacted in areas by Downing Street and the intelligence agencies.
The ISC notes that it has been unable to challenge the redactions, as it usually would, because it has been rushed into publishing the report before the upcoming General Election.
Brazil murder plot goalkeeper Bruno Fernandes de Souza sent back to jail
A goalkeeper convicted over the murder of his girlfriend, whose body was fed to dogs, has been sent back to jail after he was controversially released.
Three out of four judges on Brazil's supreme court ruled that Bruno Fernandes de Souza should go back behind bars.
The 32-year-old former player for Rio's famous Flamengo side was let out on a technicality in February while he appealed against his conviction.
He was signed by a second tier club, Boa Esporte.
Souza was serving 22 years for arranging the 2010 killing of Eliza Samudio, who was tortured and strangled before her body was fed to Rottweilers.
"Bruno" - as he is known to many in Brazil - was convicted of "meticulously" arranging the murder to avoid paying child support for the couple's baby, who was conceived while he was still married.
The player claimed at his 2013 trial that he "accepted" the plot but had not instigated it.
However his cousin, who helped carry out the murder, told police the footballer was present when the mother of his child was killed and mutilated.
Souza, 32, had been tipped for Brazil's 2014 World Cup squad and was said to be on the verge of a transfer to a big European club.
His return to professional football sparked outrage among many in Brazil and his new club lost five sponsors.
Some fans still supported him though, chanting his name at matches and training sessions.
Three out of four judges on Brazil's supreme court ruled that Bruno Fernandes de Souza should go back behind bars.
The 32-year-old former player for Rio's famous Flamengo side was let out on a technicality in February while he appealed against his conviction.
He was signed by a second tier club, Boa Esporte.
Souza was serving 22 years for arranging the 2010 killing of Eliza Samudio, who was tortured and strangled before her body was fed to Rottweilers.
"Bruno" - as he is known to many in Brazil - was convicted of "meticulously" arranging the murder to avoid paying child support for the couple's baby, who was conceived while he was still married.
The player claimed at his 2013 trial that he "accepted" the plot but had not instigated it.
However his cousin, who helped carry out the murder, told police the footballer was present when the mother of his child was killed and mutilated.
Souza, 32, had been tipped for Brazil's 2014 World Cup squad and was said to be on the verge of a transfer to a big European club.
His return to professional football sparked outrage among many in Brazil and his new club lost five sponsors.
Some fans still supported him though, chanting his name at matches and training sessions.
PMQs: Theresa May refuses to guarantee pensions triple lock
The Prime Minister has refused to guarantee the triple lock on pensions.
Theresa May twice failed to answer the question during a record 58-minute Prime Minister's Questions, saying only that "under a Conservative government, pensioner incomes would continue to increase".
It is understood that Mrs May is coming under increasing pressure to drop the pledge, which means pensions always rise by 2.5%, from the Conservative manifesto.
:: May sets record for longest-ever PMQs
During a rowdy questions session, she was put on the spot in the last PMQs before the General Election by the SNP's Angus Robertson.
Mrs May replied: "I've been very clear that under this Conservative government, we have seen pensioners benefit as a result of what we've done to the basic state pension to the tune of £1,250 a year.
"I am clear that under a Conservative government, pensioner incomes would continue to increase."
When she failed to answer Mr Robertson asked her again and said: "Is not the message to pensioners you cannot trust this Prime Minister, you cannot trust the Tories on your pension."
Theresa May twice failed to answer the question during a record 58-minute Prime Minister's Questions, saying only that "under a Conservative government, pensioner incomes would continue to increase".
It is understood that Mrs May is coming under increasing pressure to drop the pledge, which means pensions always rise by 2.5%, from the Conservative manifesto.
:: May sets record for longest-ever PMQs
During a rowdy questions session, she was put on the spot in the last PMQs before the General Election by the SNP's Angus Robertson.
Mrs May replied: "I've been very clear that under this Conservative government, we have seen pensioners benefit as a result of what we've done to the basic state pension to the tune of £1,250 a year.
"I am clear that under a Conservative government, pensioner incomes would continue to increase."
When she failed to answer Mr Robertson asked her again and said: "Is not the message to pensioners you cannot trust this Prime Minister, you cannot trust the Tories on your pension."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)