Powered By Blogger

Saturday, December 5, 2015

5 Ways to Instantly Connect With Anyone You Meet

How we communicate largely determines what we experience in life. It influences how much money we make, every relationship we have and where we go in our career.
Our income can be limited if we are unable to pitch our product to a client, ask for a desired salary in an interview or request a raise from management. On the other hand, the depth of our relationships will be constrained if we don’t have the confidence to approach new people or have the ability to resolve conflict and express ourselves.
Yet how often do we actually practice this art? Most of the time we tend to just wing it and learn as we go. Unfortunately, throughout our lives, most of us pick up some devastating yet subtle habits that can ruin conversations. And the biggest problem is that we think some of the habits are good communication tactics.
When I coach leaders and other professionals on how to elevate human performance in business, I come across these far too often. Understanding how human behavior relates to your specific business can be a big competitive advantage.
Here are five tips to help you instantly connect with anyone you meet:
1. The human brain picks up on subtle cues
When someone is talking, their subconscious is on the look out to see if people are interested or not. It’s a defense mechanism to ensure we don’t get embarrassed or hurt from our environment. Our brain will look at everything from body language, facial gestures to the words that are spoken.
When listening to someone, your eyes should never look away for longer than a few seconds. The minute you start staring at other people, TV screens or constantly looking elsewhere, you are sabotaging the conversation. It makes the other person feel like what they are saying is not important and can be a real shot to their confidence. Be aware of how you listen to others, a good idea is to ask close friends and family if there are any things you do that throw them off when they’re speaking.
2. Don’t relate everything to you
If you are in a conversation and someone is talking, let them have the stage. Many people feel that by interrupting a story and relating it to their own life, is a good way to enhance the connection. While this is true when done sparingly, there is nothing more frustrating when it’s overdone.
You can’t build trust with someone if they feel that every time they start talking, you are going to jump in. Not only does it interrupt their focus and retract their emotional investment in the conversation, but going forward they will be hesitant to talk at all.
3. Watch for filler comments
I have a close friend who I love calling out when he does this. I will be chatting with him on the phone or in person, and despite his best intentions, it is incredibly obvious when he stops listening.
He tends to overuse filler comments that don’t align with what I’m talking about. Filler comments are typical things we say to show someone that we are listening such as “yeah,” “oh cool,” “gotcha,” “interesting,” etc. However, when they are used to pretend like you’re listening, it can be very obvious and distracting.
With multi-tasking at all time high, we’ve all been conditioned to do this at some point. However, if you are not called out on it, you may never realize how disrespectful and obvious it is to the other person. As a general rule: Always listen to others, the same way you expect to be listened to.
4. Don’t pretend like you know everything
When talking with others, we often want to show that we are educated and knowledgeable. It can be hard for some people to admit they are learning something new for the first time. Many leaders find it difficult to take advice, because they feel they should know everything and be the one giving guidance.
On the other side, most employees are eager to prove themselves, so they try not to expose any of their weaknesses. However, we have all been in a conversation where we think we are bringing up something important, only to hear the other person barely acknowledge it.
It doesn’t matter your title or experience, if you want to connect with someone or influence them, you must make them feel valued. In his book, How to Win Friends and Influence People, Dale Carnegie’s principle #9 is as follows: “Make the other person feel important and do it sincerely.” When you let someone know they are providing value, it makes them feel good and enables them to open up more. So be aware of your ego, and try to stop it from controlling your behavior.
5. Plan ahead
If you are someone who gets nervous or freezes up during conversations, plan your questions in advance. This isn’t to automate your interactions and turn you into a robot. It’s to ease your mind so you can get out of your head, be confident and enjoy a natural free-flowing conversation.
You can get through any conversation by asking the right questions. So have three open-ended, thought-provoking questions for every situation you may be in. You could split the potential interactions into:
A. A networking event or potential business opportunity
B. Meeting someone new at a social event
C. Bumping into a friend
The key is to ask questions that are not invasive but do make the person have to stop and think about their response. The great thing is that not only will your conversation be more interesting — but you will be much more memorable.


Critics denounce 'Muslim' label on California shooters

The religion of the attackers who went on a shooting rampage in California should not be become the main focus of the investigation, critics say, after the FBI announced the deadly assault was an "act of terrorism". 
Fourteen people were shot dead and 21 wounded after Syed Rizwan Farook and his wife Tashfeen Malik allegedly stormed a party in San Bernardino attended by his co-workers and opened fire on Tuesday. The couple were later killed in a shoot-out with police.
Lawyers for Farook's family noted media coverage has quickly moved to portray the attackers as Muslims, while past shootings by those of other religions never brought their faith to the forefront.  
"He [Farook] was an isolated individual without any friends," lawyer David Chesley told reporters on Friday. 
"When a Christian goes to shoot up an abortion clinic, the headlines don't say 'extremist Christian Catholic' just like every headline is saying 'Muslim massacre' or 'Muslim shooters'."
Chesley noted while the FBI announced on Friday that the massacre was an act of terrorism, it did not say it had direct evidence of links to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
US-based law professor Khalid Beydoun told Al Jazeera there are violent "fringe elements" within the Muslim-American community, but he noted the same goes for other ethnic or religious groups in the United States.
Beydoun said more than 350 gun crimes this year in the US were carried out by white men, while 63 percent of mass shootings have been committed by white males since 1982.
"This conversation needs to happen across racial lines, across religious lines… One religious community should not be indicted, and that's the narrative being shaped right now within the popular media space," Beydoun told Al Jazeera.
Meanwhile, in the first poll on views of Muslim Americans taken after the mass shootings in Paris and San Bernardino, a Reuters/Ipsos poll showed 51 percent of Americans view Muslims living in the US the same as any other community. 
Only 14.6 percent said they were generally fearful.
Amaney Jamal, a politics professor at Princeton University, said it's "healthy" to see the majority positively viewing Muslims, but cautioned about growing fears.
"If terrorism is designed to create a larger gap between Muslims and Westerners, unfortunately they're succeeding," Jamal said. "The threat of terror is going to be fought by Muslims and non-Muslims together. You would like to see those gaps close so people are working together and not being fearful."

Friday, December 4, 2015

Pamela Anderson last person to pose nude for Playboy

Pamela Anderson will be the the last person to pose nude forPlayboy, ending the magazine's more than 60 year publishing tradition, the company revealed on Thursday.

The former "Baywatch" star will be featured on the cover of the January/February 2016 edition of the publication, hitting newsstands next week. 
"I got a call from [Hugh Hefner's] attorney who said, 'We don't want anybody else. There's nobody else, could you do the last cover of Playboy?'" Anderson told Entertainment Tonight.

This is Anderson's 14th Playboy cover and 15th pictorial for the magazine, according to Playboy.
The company, founded by Hugh Hefner in 1953, revealed in October that it would stop publishing nude centerfolds. Circulation of the magazine has dropped significantly from 5.6 million copies in 1975 to around 800,000 in recent

End the Gun Epidemic in America

All decent people feel sorrow and righteous fury about the latest slaughter of innocents, in California. Law enforcement and intelligence agencies are searching for motivations, including the vital question of how the murderers might have been connected to international terrorism. That is right and proper.

But motives do not matter to the dead in California, nor did they in Colorado, Oregon, South Carolina, Virginia, Connecticut and far too many other places. The attention and anger of Americans should also be directed at the elected leaders whose job is to keep us safe but who place a higher premium on the money and political power of an industry dedicated to profiting from the unfettered spread of ever more powerful firearms.

It is a moral outrage and a national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed specifically to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency. These are weapons of war, barely modified and deliberately marketed as tools of macho vigilantism and even insurrection. America’s elected leaders offer prayers for gun victims and then, callously and without fear of consequence, reject the most basic restrictions on weapons of mass killing, as they did on Thursday. They distract us with arguments about the word terrorism. Let’s be clear: These spree killings are all, in their own ways, acts of terrorism.

Opponents of gun control are saying, as they do after every killing, that no law can unfailingly forestall a specific criminal. That is true. They are talking, many with sincerity, about the constitutional challenges to effective gun regulation. Those challenges exist. They point out that determined killers obtained weapons illegally in places like France, England and Norway that have strict gun laws. Yes, they did.

But at least those countries are trying. The United States is not. Worse, politicians abet would-be killers by creating gun markets for them, and voters allow those politicians to keep their jobs. It is past time to stop talking about halting the spread of firearms, and instead to reduce their number drastically — eliminating some large categories of weapons and ammunition.
It is not necessary to debate the peculiar wording of the Second Amendment. No right is unlimited and immune from reasonable regulation.

Certain kinds of weapons, like the slightly modified combat rifles used in California, and certain kinds of ammunition, must be outlawed for civilian ownership. It is possible to define those guns in a clear and effective way and, yes, it would require Americans who own those kinds of weapons to give them up for the good of their fellow citizens.
What better time than during a presidential election to show, at long last, that our nation has retained its sense of decency?

Why the San Bernardino Shooting Is Unprecedented

The mass shooting in San Bernardino that killed 14 people and wounded 21 was unique for its male and female pair of attackers, something experts say has never occurred in the U.S.
Police have named Syed Farook, 28, and his wife Tashfeen Malik, 27, as the two suspects involved in the shooting at the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, Calif., which provides services to people with developmental disabilities. Both were killed by authorities Wednesday.
“This is the first time I’ve seen anywhere in the world a public mass shooting attack with a man and a woman that was successful,” said Adam Lankford, a University of Alabama criminal justice professor who studies mass shootings.
Dual attackers in a mass shooting are rare because one person can typically pull the more extreme of the two from turning violent, Lankford said. Mass shooters are also almost always men, with estimates showing that 98% of attackers are male. Men tend to be more violent, and studies have shown that a threat to a man’s societal status can trigger violent actions.
Still, there have been a handful of mass shootings involving women, the most deadly occurring in 2006 when Jennifer San Marco killed seven people and committed suicide at a postal facility in Goleta, Calif.
Profiles of past dual attackers can vary widely. In Columbine, experts largely identified Eric Harris as the likely instigator behind the attack who successfully convinced Dylan Klebold to take part. Similarly, John Allen Muhammad, 42, appeared to have acted as a father figure to Lee Boyd Malvo, 17, throughout the D.C. sniper shootings. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who was sentenced to death for the Boston Marathon bombing, has been portrayed as a follower of his older brother Tamerlan by his defense attorneys, but reporting by the Boston Globe has portrayed him more as a co-equal. It’s still unclear whether the suspects in the San Bernardino attacks were equally responsible for the attacks or whether one pushed the other into acting.
“The San Bernardino shooting is very unusual,” said Adam Winkler, a UCLA law professor, citing the husband-wife duo and the fact that they also were parents of an infant. “This couple, with a well-paying job and a six-month-old baby, seemingly had a lot to live for, which is not what we usually see in mass shootings.”

Cult Leader Found Guilty Of Raping Followers


Aravindan Balakrishnan, 75, was convicted of several sex assaults, cruelty to a child and false imprisonment following a trial at London's Southwark Crown Court.
The court heard how he brainwashed his followers into thinking he had God-likepowers.
He also invented a supernatural force called Jackie who he said could trigger natural disasters if he was disobeyed.
He even fathered a daughter with one of his acolytes, who was then kept prisoner in the home for three decades.
She was beaten, banned from singing nursery rhymes, and was not allowed to go to school or make friends.
She later described herself as a "shadow woman" who was kept like a "caged bird".
Detective Sergeant Paul Wiggett said she was so terrorised by her father that she "genuinely believed the day she left the house she was going to explode - that her life would come to an end".
She said afterwards: "I believe justice has definitely been done. I am very happy with the result and at the end of the day he is still my dad."
As the verdict was read out, Balakrishnan looked straight ahead.
However one of his former followers shouted: "You are sending an innocent man to prison. Shame on you."
Balakrishnan, of Enfield, north London, was found guilty of six counts of indecent assault and four counts of rape.
He was also convicted of two counts of ABH, cruelty to a child under 16, and false imprisonment.
He was cleared of one count of ABH and one count of indecent assault.
Sentencing has been adjourned until 29 January for a psychiatric report to be prepared.
Balakrishnan was remanded in custody.
:: Timeline of events in the case
:: 1963 - Balakrishnan travels to the UK from Singapore and studies at the London School of Economics.
:: 1970s - Balakrishnan sets up a Maoist commune called the Workers Institute, which is based in Brixton, south London.
next 30 years he brainwashes his female followers.
:: 1982 - One of his followers becomes pregnant with his daughter.
:: 1983 - The baby is born into the commune, where she is kept prisoner for the next 30 years.
:: Christmas Eve, 1996 - The child's mother falls from the second floor window of a terraced house where the collective had been living.
She dies several months later.
:: May 2005 - Balakrishnan's daughter runs away from the collective and goes to the police.
Police contact Bala who promises things will improve and she returns home.
:: 23 October 2013 - Balakrishnan's daughter, aged 30, manages to escape the commune and was met by police.

'Top Secret' Letter Reveals IS Thailand Plot

Thailand Ramps Up Security Following Fatal Bomb Blast
The news was revealed by Thai police who spoke after a leaked letter, marked "top secret" and "urgent" and signed by the deputy head of Thailand's special branch, was widely seen by local media.

letter said Moscow's intelligence service had revealed a group of Syrians arrived in Thailand between 15 and 31 October potentially to target Russian interests.
"They (the Syrians) travelled separately. Four went to Pattaya, two to Phuket, two to Bangkok and the other two to (an) unknown location," the letter said.
"Their purpose is to create bad incidents to affect Russians and Russia's alliance with Thailand," the letter said, without naming the suspects.
More than 1.6 million Russian tourists visited Thailand in 2014 - with Christmas and New Year being the most popular time - the largest number from any country in Europe. 
Thailand's police boss Jakthip Chaijinda confirmed the letter "was real" and said more than 200 Syrians had entered Thailand over the autumn.
Tourists board a boat in Pattaya a day after the ASEAN Summit was cancelled.
The peak holiday period for Thailand is coming up, bringing the hope of huge sums of money from tourism.
However, fears that IS Islamists may be planning an attack is likely to send fears through the tourist industry, particularly in busy resort areas such as Phuket and Pattaya, which are both popular with Russians.
Pattaya police, who say they have increased security in the area, have urged tourists not to be concerned by the reports.
Thailand's capital, Bangkok, was the target of a bombing in August in which 20 people were killed.
However, that was reportedly unconnected with IS supporters.
Russia decided to support Syria's government in September, launching air strikes against IS targets in Syria.
A month later, a Russian passenger plane carrying 224 people travelling back from the resort of Sharm el Sheikh was brought down by a bomb over the Sinai desert in Egypt.
All on board were killed.