Wednesday, February 3, 2016
RMT to recommend night Tube deal
RMT union to recommend acceptance of pay and conditions deal for night Tube service in London, executive decides.
Zica Car To Be Renamed As Virus Spreads
The car giant intended to name the vehicle 'Zica' but decided to re-brand it to reflect its claim to be a socially-responsible manufacturer.
'Zica' is a portmanteau of ‘Zippy Car’ and the vehicle is being dispatched to dealerships where it will be targeted at middle class consumers at around £3,500 and £4,000.
The hatchback will initially be branded 'Zica' for its public showcase at this week's Auto Expo 2016 in Delhi, but Tata will then register a new name with India's Registrar of Companies.
Marketing of the car began in November 2015 with the signing of Barcelona footballer Lionel Messi as the company's global brand ambassador.
In a statement, Tata Motors said: "Empathising with the hardships being caused by the ‘Zika’ virus outbreak across many countries, Tata Motors as a socially-responsible company has decided to re-brand the car."
Tata is India’s largest automobile company with consolidated revenues of £29.19bn in 2014-2015.
It also owns the Jaguar Land Rover brand which it acquired from Ford in 2008. In India, the company also produces the Tata Nano, one of India's cheapest cars at £1,740.
The Zika virus has been linked to a steep increase in the number of babies born with microcephaly, which causes abnormally small heads and brains.
Cases have so far been reported in 35 countries and territories, with Brazil among the worst affected.
Japan Threatens To Shoot Down North Korea Rocket
South Korea has warned Pyongyang would pay a "severe price" if it went ahead with the move, while China has also raised concerns and called on the regime to exercise restraint.
Reports of the planned launch led to renewed calls by the US for tougher UN sanctions, which already being discussed following North Korea's recent nuclear test.
Pyongyang informed UN agencies this week that it planned to launch an "earth observation satellite" later this month.
Japan has said it will shoot down the missile if it crosses into its airspace and prime minister Shinzo Abe condemned called the plan a "serious provocation".
In a statement, the government in Seoul said: "North Korea's notice of the plan to launch a long-range missile, coming at a time when there is a discussion for Security Council sanctions on its fourth nuclear test, is a direct challenge to the international community.
"We strongly warn that the North will pay a severe price ...if it goes ahead with the long-range missile launch plan."
US State Department spokesman John Kirby said the UN needed to "send the North Koreans a swift, firm message".
However, Pyongyang has said it has a sovereign right to pursue a space programme by launching rockets.
US officials said last week North Korea was believed to be preparing for a test launch of a long-range rocket, after activity at its test site was observed by satellite.
North Korea last launched a long-range rocket in December, 2012, sending what it described as a communications satellite into orbit.
Last month, North Korea claimed it had successfully tested a hydrogen bomb although doubt was cast on this by the US and South Korean officials.
They said the blast was too small for it to have been a full-fledged hydrogen bomb.
Austerity finally hits Greek farmers
Korinth, Greece - Yiorgos Saraptsis prunes his hectare of kiwi vines diligently, making sure that each plant has just a few long tributaries into which to channel its strength when spring comes. He explains how most of the buds will have to be plucked before they fruit, so that the remaining kiwis reach market size.
It is labour-intensive work, but since Saraptsis owns less than a hectare in the shadow of Mount Olympus in northern Greece, he is happy to do it himself, bringing his unemployed son to help at harvest time. Even so, he says, new taxes and social security contributions that the government plans to enforce will make even this low-overhead concern non-viable.
"Those who have up to two hectares are finished," he says. "You have to be a big landholder to survive. I made $11,000 from my hectare last year. My income tax and costs claimed half of that. If I didn't work the land myself I'd pay even more for labour. So what's left?"
For Saraptsis, the issue is not one of survival. His second son is a manager in a large supermarket chain, and he himself has a pension he can live off.
But for many farmers across Greece, the issue is existential. For 10 days they have blockaded highways with their tractors in a bid to draw attention to it, and they are threatening to march on Athens.
"Those who have up to two hectares are finished," he says. "You have to be a big landholder to survive. I made $11,000 from my hectare last year. My income tax and costs claimed half of that. If I didn't work the land myself I'd pay even more for labour. So what's left?"
For Saraptsis, the issue is not one of survival. His second son is a manager in a large supermarket chain, and he himself has a pension he can live off.
But for many farmers across Greece, the issue is existential. For 10 days they have blockaded highways with their tractors in a bid to draw attention to it, and they are threatening to march on Athens.
Farmers stand beside a fire as they blockade a national highway [John Psaropoulos/Al Jazeera] |
Athenians are mostly dismissive. They point to the fact that farmers were once a pampered constituency. Two decades ago they paid no social security, and until two years ago their tax was only six percent. But if austerity came late, it came swiftly.
Farmers' income tax doubled two years ago to 13 percent. When Syriza was elected last year, it promised to relieve them of a crisis-era property tax. Instead, it doubled their income tax again, and eliminated their diesel subsidy. It also raised sales tax on seeds, livestock feeds and pesticides from 13 to 23 percent. All this increased the capital farmers need to set aside to stay in business.
The reason for this debacle was that after locking horns with its creditors in the eurozone for six months, Syriza capitulated to punitive terms for a third, $93bn bailout loan. Among other things, it agreed to cut social security spending by almost $2bn a year - one percent of GDP.
This was the spark that set the tinder alight. Farmers currently pay a flat annual fee of between $780 and $1,300 a year to the Agricultural Insurance Organisation. The government now says that they should pay 27 percent of their income, which amounts to thousands of dollars even for the poorest farmer
"The government is asking us to pay 26 percent income tax, plus all of next year's taxes up-front. It's tripling our social security contributions and keeping the property tax it was going to abolish … this is a struggle for survival," says Rizos Maroudas, the head of the Larissa farmers' union in central Greece. "We'll end up on the dole, or as serfs on our own land."
Desperation creates strange bedfellows, and the proposed social security reform has now brought farmers closer to urban professionals, who are threatened with similar measures. Both plan to demonstrate in a general strike the civil service has called for Thursday.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it
Greek agriculture is worth about $7.2bn, or 3.8 percent of the economy. That alone makes it socially and politically important, because it employs an estimated 700,000 people full time; but it is a strategically important piece of the economy, because most of its value - $5.2bn - came in export revenue last year, accounting for a fifth of all foreign income, according to the Panhellenic Exporters’ Association. That capital is key to paying Greece's onerous debt, because the only way to export capital is to import it.
Moreover, agriculture has proved surprisingly resilient. In the face of last year's global slowdown, Greek exports fell by 21 percent. Agricultural exports fell by only 6 percent. However, farmers now fear that the government's measures will undermine their competitiveness.
Farmers' income tax doubled two years ago to 13 percent. When Syriza was elected last year, it promised to relieve them of a crisis-era property tax. Instead, it doubled their income tax again, and eliminated their diesel subsidy. It also raised sales tax on seeds, livestock feeds and pesticides from 13 to 23 percent. All this increased the capital farmers need to set aside to stay in business.
The reason for this debacle was that after locking horns with its creditors in the eurozone for six months, Syriza capitulated to punitive terms for a third, $93bn bailout loan. Among other things, it agreed to cut social security spending by almost $2bn a year - one percent of GDP.
This was the spark that set the tinder alight. Farmers currently pay a flat annual fee of between $780 and $1,300 a year to the Agricultural Insurance Organisation. The government now says that they should pay 27 percent of their income, which amounts to thousands of dollars even for the poorest farmer
"The government is asking us to pay 26 percent income tax, plus all of next year's taxes up-front. It's tripling our social security contributions and keeping the property tax it was going to abolish … this is a struggle for survival," says Rizos Maroudas, the head of the Larissa farmers' union in central Greece. "We'll end up on the dole, or as serfs on our own land."
Desperation creates strange bedfellows, and the proposed social security reform has now brought farmers closer to urban professionals, who are threatened with similar measures. Both plan to demonstrate in a general strike the civil service has called for Thursday.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it
Greek agriculture is worth about $7.2bn, or 3.8 percent of the economy. That alone makes it socially and politically important, because it employs an estimated 700,000 people full time; but it is a strategically important piece of the economy, because most of its value - $5.2bn - came in export revenue last year, accounting for a fifth of all foreign income, according to the Panhellenic Exporters’ Association. That capital is key to paying Greece's onerous debt, because the only way to export capital is to import it.
Moreover, agriculture has proved surprisingly resilient. In the face of last year's global slowdown, Greek exports fell by 21 percent. Agricultural exports fell by only 6 percent. However, farmers now fear that the government's measures will undermine their competitiveness.
At the very least, they want more of their expenses deducted from taxable income. "If the government wants to see me as a business, then I should have the benefits as well as the disadvantages of that," says Dimitris Dimitriadis, the head of the eastern Mani farmers' union in the Peloponnese. "For instance, if I invest in a tractor, the government allows me to offset 10 percent of that cost per year for five years .... So it recognises only half the expense."
He points out that the government subsidises new jobs in other industries for six months. "If all this applies to businesses, why doesn't it apply to me?"
The government counters that it will spend more than $11bn in European Union subsidies on farmers over a seven-year period, but farmers like Dimitriadis believe that policy adheres to an outdated model of spoon-feeding.
"Last year I got 1,100 euros [$1,200] in subsidies," says Konstantinos Panayotopoulos, who grows raisins and olives on 10 hectares in Korinth. "I need to invest 70,000 [euros] in next year's crop. Who cares if we're in Europe? I don't care for subsidies. Do they want us to produce? Then leave us alone."
End of an era
He points out that the government subsidises new jobs in other industries for six months. "If all this applies to businesses, why doesn't it apply to me?"
The government counters that it will spend more than $11bn in European Union subsidies on farmers over a seven-year period, but farmers like Dimitriadis believe that policy adheres to an outdated model of spoon-feeding.
"Last year I got 1,100 euros [$1,200] in subsidies," says Konstantinos Panayotopoulos, who grows raisins and olives on 10 hectares in Korinth. "I need to invest 70,000 [euros] in next year's crop. Who cares if we're in Europe? I don't care for subsidies. Do they want us to produce? Then leave us alone."
End of an era
Panayotopoulos is in his 70s, and an example of the fact that Greek farmers rarely retire. This explains why they are unimpressed by the government's argument that their pension will rise from about $400 to about $500 under the new regime.
Farmers say they are afraid that new policies will lead them off the land [John Psaropoulos/Al Jazeera] |
Agriculture minister Vangelis Apostolou, the agriculture minister, has dismissed any notion of withdrawing the social security reform. "That's like asking us to blow our agreement with creditors sky high, and put our country back in danger of leaving the eurozone - even the European Union," he said on January 24.
At issue, he says, is the fact that the government will spend as much as $3.7bn topping up the Agricultural Insurance Organisation, or OGA, this year.
"Eighty percent of the money [contributed by the state to OGA] goes to people who are not farmers," counters Dimitriadis. "The Roma are paid out of OGA, so are people with family benefits and so are paraplegics and returnees from the diaspora. If OGA has a million enrolments, only 400,000 are truly farmers."
Many farmers are afraid that the new policies, unless drastically revised, will lead them off the land.
At issue, he says, is the fact that the government will spend as much as $3.7bn topping up the Agricultural Insurance Organisation, or OGA, this year.
"Eighty percent of the money [contributed by the state to OGA] goes to people who are not farmers," counters Dimitriadis. "The Roma are paid out of OGA, so are people with family benefits and so are paraplegics and returnees from the diaspora. If OGA has a million enrolments, only 400,000 are truly farmers."
Many farmers are afraid that the new policies, unless drastically revised, will lead them off the land.
"Much of the economy depends on agriculture and it will suffer. You can already see the effects in the shops and businesses of Larissa," says Yiorgos Roustas, a journalist who covers agriculture in the plain of Thessaly, Greece's breadbasket.
"But the main effect is that small landholders won't survive. Most of the farmers at roadblocks are in this group. They're the ones who supplement their farming income with income from another profession. They will have to quit and sell their farms for a song," he says.
The Greek state's economy has been ruled by small and medium-sized enterprises for all of its 200-year history. It is they who still generate 90 percent of employment. Austerity struck the urban economy first, and shuttered a quarter of a million businesses - a third of the total. Millions more are thought to be moribund. It may now have the same effect on the rural economy.
Asked whether he is worried that his two sons will sell the kiwi farm, Yiorgos Saraptsis, shrugs. "For as long as I am alive, I will work it," he says. "After that, they can do what they like."
"But the main effect is that small landholders won't survive. Most of the farmers at roadblocks are in this group. They're the ones who supplement their farming income with income from another profession. They will have to quit and sell their farms for a song," he says.
The Greek state's economy has been ruled by small and medium-sized enterprises for all of its 200-year history. It is they who still generate 90 percent of employment. Austerity struck the urban economy first, and shuttered a quarter of a million businesses - a third of the total. Millions more are thought to be moribund. It may now have the same effect on the rural economy.
Asked whether he is worried that his two sons will sell the kiwi farm, Yiorgos Saraptsis, shrugs. "For as long as I am alive, I will work it," he says. "After that, they can do what they like."
Does Nigeria Have What It Takes to Defeat Boko Haram?
Organized assaults from multiple directions. Check. An arsenal of light weapons and rocket launchers. Check. Abductions, looting and arson. Check. Female suicide bombers. Check.
Before Boko Haram insurgents attacked the northeastern Nigerian village of Dalori on Jan.30, killing at least 86 using tactics that have become wearily familiar, government officials had started to crow that the group’s recent reliance on single target suicide attacks was a sign of weakness and desperation. Instead, the weekend attack on a village just a few miles from the provincial capital of Maiduguri, home to one of the Nigeria’s biggest army bases, was a sobering indication of the group’s resilience.
In the run-up to Nigeria’s 2015 elections, presidential candidate Muhammadu Buhari, now president, pledged to defeat the terror group by the end of the year. Technically he achieved that goal with a series of military defeats that pushed the militant group out of the northeastern towns and villages it had captured in late 2014 and back into the barely inhabited forest lands that are its stronghold. But insurgent groups don’t need territory to thrive. They need weak governance. Northeast Nigeria, where Boko Haram is based, has that in spades.
The fact that Boko Haram was able to get so close to a major army operating base has “huge symbolic value,” says Malte Liewerscheidt, head Nigeria analyst for the U.K.-based Verisk Maplecroft risk management company. Boko Haram’s return to old tactics proves that defeating them cannot be achieved by military might alone, he says. “Unless you tackle the underlying issues that have allowed Boko Haram to thrive, it doesn’t matter if you cut down the leadership. Others will just rise in their place.”
Buhari has sketched out an ambitious plan to do just that, with proposals to invest in the historically neglected northeast in order to bolster education and employment opportunities, which would go a long way towards denying support for Boko Haram. But those investments require money that Nigeria no longer has. Nearly 70 percent of government revenue comes from oil, which has plummeted in price over the past year. The country is currently in talks with the World Bank and the African Development Bank over loans of up to $3.5 billion to help with a forecasted $11 billion budget shortfall. “Buhari set up an ambitious budget which was supposed to address all these problems, but the reality is that the coffers are empty,” says Liewerscheidt.
In the absence of state development programs, Boko Haram keeps attracting local support and new members — no mean feat for an organization that has made its name abducting women and children, stealing livestock, and setting homes on fire. According to Gideon Poki, a resident of Maiduguri and the local project manager for Search for Common Ground, a U.S.-based international NGO that focuses on peace building in conflict zones, Boko Haram thrives on a combination of fear and greed. Poki works with village leaders in the region to develop what he calls an “early warning system” for Boko Haram infiltration. It is based on shared information and communication between elders, teachers and preachers.
Although Boko Haram leader Abubakar Shekau justifies his actions based on Muslim ideology, Poki says he sees little evidence of religious fervor among his followers. “Most of the time, when fighters are arrested, they are arrested with drugs, alcohol or [methamphetamine] tablets. This is not characteristic of people who are fighting a religious war.”
He suspects that poverty and unemployment are far more powerful drivers. “These attacks, well, before they burn the houses down, they go and loot. They steal all items and money and food they can find.”
Fear is another powerful incentive. Even though the army garrison is just a few miles from Dalori, residents say that it took at least three hours for the army to mount a response, and another two hours for them to get enough backup to stop the attack entirely. “Not many people trust that the army will help them,” says Poki. And for good reason: soldiers often complain that corruption in the higher ranks means that they are either underpaid or underequipped.
Distrust of the army plays a significant role in Boko Haram’s deep rooted grip in the region, adds Liewerscheidt of Verisk Maplecroft. The Nigerian army has been regularly accused of committing horrific human rights abuses in the region, dating back to Boko Haram’s founding as a religious organization back in 2002, even before it started its terror campaign in 2010. “Even then the armed forces had such a heavy-handed response — summary executions, torture, forced disappearances — so trust in the security agencies has suffered immensely,” says Liewerscheidt.
On top of that there is a deep-seated conviction among many Nigerians that the state is little more than a cash machine for the country’s elite, including top military brass. “If the armed forces want to defeat Boko Haram, they will need to earn back the public’s trust,” says Liewerscheidt. “This is not a conventional war. The army needs the help of local communities to identify and expose Boko Haram operatives.”
As presidential candidate, Buhari identified many of these problems, and promised to strengthen the military, punish abuses and end corruption. But while his cash-strapped government struggles to fund these policies and boost development programs, Boko Haram is likely to keep to its own playbook of abduction and looting to fill its ranks and its coffers.
Lord Lucan's Son Granted Death Certificate
George Bingham applied under the Presumption of Death Act, which came into effect in 2014, so he can inherit the title as 8th Earl.
Lord Lucan disappeared after Sandra Rivett, the nanny for his three children, was found murdered at the family home at 46 Lower Belgrade Street in central London on 7 November 1974.
Lord Bingham said: "I am very happy with the judgement of the court in this matter. It has been a very long time coming."
Draft EU deal: What Cameron wanted and what he got
some work is needed to hammer out the details ahead of a crunch summit in Brussels on 18 February.
But how does the 16-page letter drawn up by the President of the European Council, Donald Tusk, measure up to what the prime minister originally wanted from the negotiations?
The BBC's chief correspondent Gavin Hewitt gives his verdict while Europe correspondent Chris Morris looks at how the deal will be perceived elsewhere in the EU.
Sovereignty
What Cameron wanted: Allowing Britain to opt out from the EU's founding ambition to forge an "ever closer union" of the peoples of Europe so it will not be drawn into further political integration in a "formal, legally binding and irreversible way". Giving greater powers to national parliaments to block EU legislation.
What Tusk has offered: "The references to an ever closer union among the peoples are... compatible with different paths of integration being available for different member states and do not compel all member states to aim for a common destination.
"It is recognised that the United Kingdom... is not committed to further political integration into the European Union.
"Where reasoned opinions on the non-compliance of a draft union legislative act with the principle of subsidiarity, sent within 12 weeks from the transmission of that draft, represent more than 55% of the votes allocated to the national parliaments, the council presidency will include the item on the agenda of the council for a comprehensive discussion."
Gavin Hewitt: The words "ever closer union" stay, but they have been interpreted as not meaning political integration or new powers for the EU. In essence, this is what the government wanted - the EU accepts there are not just different speeds to European integration but countries may have different destinations. What the government did not get was recognition the EU was a union with "multiple currencies".
Mr Cameron has won inclusion of a "red-card" mechanism, a new power. If 55% of national parliaments agree, they could effectively block or veto a commission proposal. The question is how likely is this red card system to be used. A much weaker "yellow card" was only used twice. The red-card mechanism depends crucially on building alliances, and the UK has not always been successful at that.
In these negotiations, some key areas seem to have been dropped. There will be no repatriation of EU social and employment law, which was a 2010 manifesto commitment. There will be no changes to the working-hours directive. The sceptics will argue that over sovereignty, the UK has not won back control over its affairs.
Chris Morris: The idea that different member states will move at different speeds and on "different paths" was already widely accepted. Britain won't be in the inner core, but we knew that already. There is also specific language in these draft proposals that encourages the eurozone to integrate further - as most governments accept that it must.
The idea of a red card for national parliaments makes a nice headline, but it may not make much difference in practice. It would still be easier to block legislation in the Council of Ministers (threshold 35%) than under the new proposal in which 55% of EU parliaments would have to club together to make an objection.
Migrants and welfare benefits
What Cameron wanted: The Conservative manifesto said: "We will insist that EU migrants who want to claim tax credits and child benefit must live here and contribute to our country for a minimum of four years." It also proposed a "new residency requirement for social housing, so that EU migrants cannot even be considered for a council house unless they have been living in an area for at least four years".
The manifesto also pledged to "end the ability of EU jobseekers to claim any job-seeking benefits at all", adding that "if jobseekers have not found a job within six months, they will be required to leave".
Mr Cameron also wanted to prevent EU migrant workers in the UK sending child benefit or child tax credit money home. "If an EU migrant's child is living abroad, then they should receive no child benefit or child tax credit, no matter how long they have worked in the UK and no matter how much tax they have paid," says the Tory manifesto.
What Tusk has offered:"[New legislation will] provide for an alert and safeguard mechanism that responds to situations of inflows of workers from other member states of an exceptional magnitude over an extended period of time… the implementing act would authorise the member state to limit the access of union workers newly entering its labour market to in-work benefits for a total of up to four years from the commencement of employment."
Gavin Hewitt: This is the "emergency brake" there has been much talk about. If there were excessive strain on the welfare system, in-work benefits could be denied to EU workers for four years. This is, essentially, what Mr Cameron wanted.
The government had promised to reduce the numbers of EU migrants and believes the UK's current benefits act as a pull factor. The EU has agreed it would be "justified" to trigger an emergency brake without delay after the referendum if the UK votes to stay in the EU.
But there are questions here:
- For how long would the emergency brake stay in place? Four years - but who would judge whether an emergency no longer existed? Who would pull or release the brake?
- What would happen to migration when the brake was lifted? Under the proposal, the access to benefits would gradually increase - so how much of a disincentive to come to the UK would that prove to be?
Mr Cameron has failed in his demand to ban migrant workers from sending child benefit money back home, but they would get a lower level of payments if the cost of living in the country where the child lives is lower.
The government has already reached an agreement on out-of-work benefits. Newly arrived EU migrants are banned from claiming jobseeker's allowance for three months. If they have not found a job within six months they will be required to leave. EU migrant workers in the UK who lose their job, through no fault of their own, are entitled to the same benefits as UK citizens, including jobseekers allowance and housing benefit, for six months.
The Tusk letter does not mention changes to social housing entitlement but they were never part of Mr Cameron's preliminary negotiations.
Chris Morris: There will still be considerable opposition in Eastern Europe towards anything that smacks of discrimination against their citizens. Little wonder that David Cameron's next stop on his tour of Europe will be a return to Warsaw on Friday. He has some persuading still to do.
There is also a lot of detail surrounding the emergency brake proposal that remains vague, and there's likely to be some difficult late night debate ahead. The basic premise - that the UK can treat nationals from other EU countries differently, even if only for a short time - is certainly a departure from the status quo. Other countries may look to take advantage of this as well, and that will make some EU officials nervous.
overnance or safeguarding interests of countries outside the eurozone
What Cameron wanted: An explicit recognition that the euro is not the only currency of the European Union, to ensure countries outside the eurozone are not materially disadvantaged. He also wanted safeguards that steps to further financial union cannot be imposed on non-eurozone members and the UK will not have to contribute to eurozone bailouts.
What Tusk offered: "Measures, the purpose of which is to further deepen the economic and monetary union, will be voluntary for member states whose currency is not the euro.
"Mutual respect between member states participating or not in the operation of the euro area will be ensured.
"Legal acts... [between eurozone countries] shall respect the internal market."
Gavin Hewitt: The UK government wanted safeguards that as the eurozone integrated further, it did not take decisions that threatened the essential interests of those outside the eurozone, such as Britain. Key British interests are the single market and the City.
Crucially, much of the detail here has not been worked out. It is not clear what rights non-eurozone countries have beyond being consulted and not having to pay for the financial stability of the euro. This could well be a source of friction at the forthcoming summit.
Chris Morris: It's just a hunch, but this could still be the issue that has EU leaders haggling into the early hours when they convene for a summit later this month. It threatened to delay the release of Mr Tusk's draft proposals today, as French President Francois Hollande sought assurances that Britain would not hold any kind of veto over eurozone business.
Another emergency brake would be deployed here, but it is not entirely clear what would happen if consensus between euro ins and outs proved impossible. This is such an important long-term issue that there may be those who say that further clarity is essential before they can sign up to a final deal.
Competitiveness
What Cameron wanted: A target for the reduction of the "burden" of excessive regulation and extending the single market
What Tusk offered: "The EU must increase efforts towards enhancing competitiveness, along the lines set out in the Declaration of the European Council on competitiveness. To this end the relevant EU institutions and the member states will make all efforts to strengthen the internal market….this means lowering administrative burdens."
Gavin Hewitt: This was the least controversial of the government's demands. The spirit of the times in Brussels is to do less but better. Such statements do not always accord with reality, however. Certainly Mr Cameron has been at the forefront of arguing for less red tape and less regulation on business.
Chris Morris: Who doesn't want a more competitive Europe? The question is how best you achieve it. These proposals envisage a declaration that the EU would work towards greater integration of the single market. But they've said that before, so it doesn't feel all that new.
There is also provision for an annual audit of EU regulation with the aim of reducing red tape - but, again, that is already a stated priority of the current European Commission. This feels a little bit like more of the same, but officials argue that it needed clarifying in the context of the EU debate in the UK.
Further reading on the UK's EU referendum
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)