Donald Trump has said North Korea is "looking for trouble" and warned the US would "solve the problem" - with or without China's help.
The President's defiant Twitter message came after Pyongyang promised a strong response if the US "dares opt for a military action", warning such a move would have "catastrophic consequences".
Washington has sent the USS Carl Vinson aircraft carrier and its battle groupto the region for annual US-South Korea war games, which Pyongyang views as a dress rehearsal for an invasion.
The US says it is aimed at maintaining "readiness and presence" in the region.
:: After Syria, could North Korea be next?
Tensions on the Korean peninsula are already high because of recent ballistic missile launches by the North, which violate UN resolutions.
Russia's foreign ministry said in a statement it was "really worried" about what the US "has in mind for North Korea", ahead of a visit to Moscow by US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson.
At the weekend Mr Tillerson said missile strikes on a Syrian air base in retaliation for a chemical weapon attack should serve as a warning for any country operating outside of international norms.
In the aftermath of that thinly veiled threat, a spokesman for North Korea's foreign ministry said: "We will hold the US wholly accountable for the catastrophic consequences to be entailed by its outrageous actions."
He added: "If the US dares opt for a military action, crying out for 'pre-emptive attack' and 'removal of the headquarters', the DPRK (the formal name for North Korea) is ready to react to any mode of war desired by the US."
Pyongyang has long maintained the US is preparing some kind of assault against it and justifies its pursuit of nuclear weapons as defensive in nature.
A top US official said on Sunday that President Trump had asked his advisers for a range of options to rein in North Korea.
Mr Trump has previously threatened unilateral action against Pyongyang if China - the North's major ally - fails to help curb its neighbour's nuclear weapons programme.
But the North's latest response suggests the reclusive state is determined to continue on its current path, despite numerous rounds of UN sanctions.
North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un wants to develop a long-range missile capable of hitting the US mainland with a nuclear warhead.
Five nuclear tests have been staged so far, two of them last year, and there is speculation another test could be imminent.
The North is set to mark the 105th birthday of its late founding leader on Saturday, an occasion sometimes celebrated with a display of military might.
South Korea's prime minister and acting president has also warned of a "grave provocation" by Pyongyang to coincide with other anniversaries, including the 25 April foundation day for its army.
Tuesday, April 11, 2017
Charlie Gard: Doctors can withdraw life support from sick baby
Doctors can withdraw life support from sick baby Charlie Gard against his parents' wishes, a High Court judge has ruled.
The eight-month-old's parents, Chris Gard and Connie Yates, of Bedfont, west London, wanted permission to take him to a hospital in the US for a trial treatment.
But doctors said the boy, who suffers from mitochondrial disease that causes progressive muscle weakness and brain damage, should be moved to a palliative care regime.
Mr Justice Francis made the ruling following a three-day hearing in the Family Division of the High Court in London. He also visited Charlie at Great Ormond Street Hospital.
Image:Chris Gard and Connie Yates, the parents of the eight-month-old boy
He said he had come to the decision with the "heaviest of hearts", but with "complete conviction" for Charlie's best interests.
"It is with the heaviest of hearts, but with complete conviction for Charlie's best interests, that I find it is in Charlie's best interests that I accede to these applications and rule that Great Ormond Street may lawfully withdraw all treatment save for palliative care to permit Charlie to die with dignity," he said.
"I want to thank the team of experts and carers at Great Ormond Street, and others who cannot be named, for the extraordinary care that they have provided to this family.
"Most importantly of all, I want to thank Charlie's parents for their brave and dignified campaign on his behalf, but more than anything to pay tribute to their absolute dedication to their wonderful boy, from the day he was born."
Image:His parents had wanted to send him to the US for treatment
Solicitor Laura Hobey-Hamsher said Charlie's parents were "devastated" by the decision and are struggling to understand why the judge had not "at least given Charlie the chance of treatment".
She said: "Lessons do however need to be learned about how medical professionals face decisions such as this, how they act with sufficient speed, and how they communicate with the families of desperately ill children, such as Charlie.
"It is regrettable and inexplicable that much of the reasoning for their decisions only came to light after proceedings had been issued.
"It is too simplistic to say that had matters been handled better, Charlie would be well, but undoubtedly, it did not assist."
She added that Charlie's parents wanted to thank the media and the public for their generosity and support.
Charlie was born on 4 August, 2016 with the rare genetic condition.
His parents launched a GoFundMe appeal to raise funds for his treatment two months ago, and reached their £1.2m target on Sunday following donations by more than 80,000 people.
A spokesman for GoFundMe said it would have talks with Charlie's parents over what will happen with the money raised for his treatment.
He added: "We'll be speaking privately to the family in the next few days about what they want to do and how we can support them."
The eight-month-old's parents, Chris Gard and Connie Yates, of Bedfont, west London, wanted permission to take him to a hospital in the US for a trial treatment.
But doctors said the boy, who suffers from mitochondrial disease that causes progressive muscle weakness and brain damage, should be moved to a palliative care regime.
Mr Justice Francis made the ruling following a three-day hearing in the Family Division of the High Court in London. He also visited Charlie at Great Ormond Street Hospital.
Image:Chris Gard and Connie Yates, the parents of the eight-month-old boyHe said he had come to the decision with the "heaviest of hearts", but with "complete conviction" for Charlie's best interests.
"It is with the heaviest of hearts, but with complete conviction for Charlie's best interests, that I find it is in Charlie's best interests that I accede to these applications and rule that Great Ormond Street may lawfully withdraw all treatment save for palliative care to permit Charlie to die with dignity," he said.
"I want to thank the team of experts and carers at Great Ormond Street, and others who cannot be named, for the extraordinary care that they have provided to this family.
"Most importantly of all, I want to thank Charlie's parents for their brave and dignified campaign on his behalf, but more than anything to pay tribute to their absolute dedication to their wonderful boy, from the day he was born."
Image:His parents had wanted to send him to the US for treatmentSolicitor Laura Hobey-Hamsher said Charlie's parents were "devastated" by the decision and are struggling to understand why the judge had not "at least given Charlie the chance of treatment".
She said: "Lessons do however need to be learned about how medical professionals face decisions such as this, how they act with sufficient speed, and how they communicate with the families of desperately ill children, such as Charlie.
"It is regrettable and inexplicable that much of the reasoning for their decisions only came to light after proceedings had been issued.
"It is too simplistic to say that had matters been handled better, Charlie would be well, but undoubtedly, it did not assist."
She added that Charlie's parents wanted to thank the media and the public for their generosity and support.
Charlie was born on 4 August, 2016 with the rare genetic condition.
His parents launched a GoFundMe appeal to raise funds for his treatment two months ago, and reached their £1.2m target on Sunday following donations by more than 80,000 people.
A spokesman for GoFundMe said it would have talks with Charlie's parents over what will happen with the money raised for his treatment.
He added: "We'll be speaking privately to the family in the next few days about what they want to do and how we can support them."
US is planning new missile strikes on Damascus, claims Putin
Vladimir Putin has claimed he has information that the United States is planning a fresh wave of airstrikes in Syria.
The Russian president said Moscow had also received intelligence about planned fake chemical weapons attacks with the sole purpose of pinning the blame on Bashar al Assad's regime.
Russia has rejected suggestions from the outset that the Syrian government was behind a gas attack in Idlib province which killed more than 80 people, including many children.
The US retaliated with airstrikes on a Syrian airbase from which it believes the chemical attack in the rebel-held town of Khan Sheikhoun was launched.
Both the Syrian regime and Russia have denied they were involved.
Mr Putin appealed to the United Nations to launch an official investigation into the attack.
He compared the allegation levelled at Mr Assad to how the US justified its intervention in Iraq in 2003.
Claims that Saddam Hussein's regime had weapons of mass destruction were never proven.
His comments came as Turkey confirmed sarin gas was used in the attack in northern Syria - and US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson arrived in Moscow for crucial talks on "a solution which will deliver a lasting political settlement" in Syria.
G7 foreign ministers earlier rejected British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson's calls to broaden sanctions against Russia and Syria.
Italian foreign minister Angelino Alfano said Russia must not be "pushed into a corner" over Syria.
The Russian president said Moscow had also received intelligence about planned fake chemical weapons attacks with the sole purpose of pinning the blame on Bashar al Assad's regime.
Russia has rejected suggestions from the outset that the Syrian government was behind a gas attack in Idlib province which killed more than 80 people, including many children.
The US retaliated with airstrikes on a Syrian airbase from which it believes the chemical attack in the rebel-held town of Khan Sheikhoun was launched.
Both the Syrian regime and Russia have denied they were involved.
Mr Putin appealed to the United Nations to launch an official investigation into the attack.
He compared the allegation levelled at Mr Assad to how the US justified its intervention in Iraq in 2003.
Claims that Saddam Hussein's regime had weapons of mass destruction were never proven.
His comments came as Turkey confirmed sarin gas was used in the attack in northern Syria - and US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson arrived in Moscow for crucial talks on "a solution which will deliver a lasting political settlement" in Syria.
G7 foreign ministers earlier rejected British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson's calls to broaden sanctions against Russia and Syria.
Italian foreign minister Angelino Alfano said Russia must not be "pushed into a corner" over Syria.
Jared Kushner, Man of Steel
Why don’t we just stitch him a red cape, put him in spandex, affix a stylized “S” to his chest and be done with it?
SuperJared has taken flight.
He’s President Trump’s point man with the Chinese, having finalized the details of the big meeting at Mar-a-Loco later this week. He was Trump’s middleman with the Mexicans not long ago.
“A shadow secretary of state,” The Washington Post calledJared Kushner, and that was well before he traveled to Iraq on Monday, beating the actual secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, to one of the most consequential theaters of American foreign policy.
Kushner’s to-do list, not Tillerson’s, contains the small, pesky item of brokering a durable truce between the Israelis and the Palestinians. “If you can’t produce peace in the Middle East, nobody can,” Trump said to the 36-year-old real estate scion, who has absolutely no background in diplomacy, from the stage of an inaugural party.
The precise strategy is under wraps. As Henry Kissinger, an informal adviser to Kushner and others in the Trump administration, told Annie Karni of Politico in mid-February: “It’s not clear to me in what way he’s in charge of it, whether he’s in charge of it with supervision from the White House, or whether he’s supposed to be the actual negotiator. Nor has it been defined what they’re negotiating about.”
Mere details! Just leave things to Kushner. He’ll figure it out in those down moments when he’s not supervising the brand new Office of American Innovation, whose modest ambition is a full-scale reorganization of the federal government that makes it more efficient.
His plan on that front is clear. He’ll simply do everything himself. Take note: When you file your taxes in about two weeks, you can send them either to the Internal Revenue Service or to Kushner. He’ll be chipping in with the auditing.
Sign Up for the Opinion Today Newsletter
Every weekday, get thought-provoking commentary from Op-Ed columnists, the Times editorial board and contributing writers from around the world.
I jest, and I do so in line with the mocking tone of the media’s continuing tally of tasks being piled on Kushner’s plate. But Kushner’s many mandates aren’t a laughing matter. They’re a reflection of some of Trump’s most unsettling traits as president, and Kushner is a symbol of his delusions.
Trump keeps expanding Kushner’s bloated portfolio while leaving key agencies woefully understaffed, and that’s “a sign that he doesn’t know how government works,” said a former Bush administration official who has had extensive dealings with Kushner.
“There’s no deputy secretary of state,” the official told me. “There’s no deputy secretary of defense.” He ticked off an array of other unfilled positions, insisted that these gaps can’t all be chalked up to some noble desire to shrink government and said that they pretty much prevent any meaningful follow-through on whatever bold ideas Kushner might hatch. “Trump just thinks, ‘Oh, yeah, Jared’s in charge of that.’ In charge of what? What’s he running? You need a bureaucratic infrastructure.”
Trump’s overreliance on Kushner illustrates the extraordinary premium he places on loyalty. Kushner’s status as a visionary is entirely disputable: His real-estate company was a birthright, not a start-up, and as an article by Charles Bagli in The Times this week demonstrated, one of Kushner’s key acquisitions, the skyscraper at 666 Fifth Avenue, turned into an albatross. But he married Ivanka. He’s family. And he chose the political ambitions of his father-in-law over his own previous reputation as a reasonably enlightened man.
Kushner also exemplifies the degree to which Trump not only prizes the fresh eyes of people from outside of politics, which is sensible, but downright fetishizes them, which isn’t. To the extent that the administration is staffed, it teems with government naïfs, and that has been apparent in the botched composition and rollout of executive orders and in the failed attempt to undo Obamacare.
Trump’s cavalier attitude toward conflicts of interest is manifest in Kushner, who was reportedly talking about government business with the Chinese ambassador even as his family’s company sought Chinese investment for that skyscraper.
So is Trump’s magical thinking. The president seems to see certain people as exempt from the laws of gravity, and he has accorded Kushner a place snug beside him in that pantheon. He keeps telling us that he can predict the future, and he keeps telling himself that Kushner can juggle more than even the most seasoned, brilliant White House aides of yesteryear pulled off. Kushner doesn’t seem to be quibbling.
I’m told by insiders that when Trump’s long-shot campaign led to victory, he and Kushner became convinced not only that they’d tapped into something that everybody was missing about America, but that they’d tapped into something that everybody was missing about the two of them.
Kushner was reborn with new powers, and to the heavens he ascended.
It’s a bird! It’s a plane!
It’s ridiculous.
SuperJared has taken flight.
He’s President Trump’s point man with the Chinese, having finalized the details of the big meeting at Mar-a-Loco later this week. He was Trump’s middleman with the Mexicans not long ago.
“A shadow secretary of state,” The Washington Post calledJared Kushner, and that was well before he traveled to Iraq on Monday, beating the actual secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, to one of the most consequential theaters of American foreign policy.
Kushner’s to-do list, not Tillerson’s, contains the small, pesky item of brokering a durable truce between the Israelis and the Palestinians. “If you can’t produce peace in the Middle East, nobody can,” Trump said to the 36-year-old real estate scion, who has absolutely no background in diplomacy, from the stage of an inaugural party.
The precise strategy is under wraps. As Henry Kissinger, an informal adviser to Kushner and others in the Trump administration, told Annie Karni of Politico in mid-February: “It’s not clear to me in what way he’s in charge of it, whether he’s in charge of it with supervision from the White House, or whether he’s supposed to be the actual negotiator. Nor has it been defined what they’re negotiating about.”
Mere details! Just leave things to Kushner. He’ll figure it out in those down moments when he’s not supervising the brand new Office of American Innovation, whose modest ambition is a full-scale reorganization of the federal government that makes it more efficient.
His plan on that front is clear. He’ll simply do everything himself. Take note: When you file your taxes in about two weeks, you can send them either to the Internal Revenue Service or to Kushner. He’ll be chipping in with the auditing.
Sign Up for the Opinion Today Newsletter
Every weekday, get thought-provoking commentary from Op-Ed columnists, the Times editorial board and contributing writers from around the world.
I jest, and I do so in line with the mocking tone of the media’s continuing tally of tasks being piled on Kushner’s plate. But Kushner’s many mandates aren’t a laughing matter. They’re a reflection of some of Trump’s most unsettling traits as president, and Kushner is a symbol of his delusions.
Trump keeps expanding Kushner’s bloated portfolio while leaving key agencies woefully understaffed, and that’s “a sign that he doesn’t know how government works,” said a former Bush administration official who has had extensive dealings with Kushner.
“There’s no deputy secretary of state,” the official told me. “There’s no deputy secretary of defense.” He ticked off an array of other unfilled positions, insisted that these gaps can’t all be chalked up to some noble desire to shrink government and said that they pretty much prevent any meaningful follow-through on whatever bold ideas Kushner might hatch. “Trump just thinks, ‘Oh, yeah, Jared’s in charge of that.’ In charge of what? What’s he running? You need a bureaucratic infrastructure.”
Trump’s overreliance on Kushner illustrates the extraordinary premium he places on loyalty. Kushner’s status as a visionary is entirely disputable: His real-estate company was a birthright, not a start-up, and as an article by Charles Bagli in The Times this week demonstrated, one of Kushner’s key acquisitions, the skyscraper at 666 Fifth Avenue, turned into an albatross. But he married Ivanka. He’s family. And he chose the political ambitions of his father-in-law over his own previous reputation as a reasonably enlightened man.
Kushner also exemplifies the degree to which Trump not only prizes the fresh eyes of people from outside of politics, which is sensible, but downright fetishizes them, which isn’t. To the extent that the administration is staffed, it teems with government naïfs, and that has been apparent in the botched composition and rollout of executive orders and in the failed attempt to undo Obamacare.
Trump’s cavalier attitude toward conflicts of interest is manifest in Kushner, who was reportedly talking about government business with the Chinese ambassador even as his family’s company sought Chinese investment for that skyscraper.
So is Trump’s magical thinking. The president seems to see certain people as exempt from the laws of gravity, and he has accorded Kushner a place snug beside him in that pantheon. He keeps telling us that he can predict the future, and he keeps telling himself that Kushner can juggle more than even the most seasoned, brilliant White House aides of yesteryear pulled off. Kushner doesn’t seem to be quibbling.
I’m told by insiders that when Trump’s long-shot campaign led to victory, he and Kushner became convinced not only that they’d tapped into something that everybody was missing about America, but that they’d tapped into something that everybody was missing about the two of them.
Kushner was reborn with new powers, and to the heavens he ascended.
It’s a bird! It’s a plane!
It’s ridiculous.
Russia says US ties are 'worst since Cold War' ahead of Tillerson visit
Russia's foreign ministry has said the country's relations with the US are the most difficult since the end of the Cold War.
It comes ahead of a visit by US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson to Moscow - and after G7 foreign ministers rejected UK Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson's calls to broaden sanctions against Russia and Syria.
Pressure has been mounting on Russia to end its support for Syrian leader Bashar al Assad following the US missile attack on a Syrian airbase, carried out in retaliation for a chemical weapons attack blamed on the president's regime - something it denies.
However, at a news conference at the close of the summit, Italian foreign minister Angelino Alfano said Russia must not be "pushed into a corner" over Syria.
Mr Tillerson, who is heading to Moscow to work on "a solution which will deliver a lasting political settlement" in Syria, has raised fresh expectations of aggressive military action against the country and any other repressive regimes.
Speaking in a tougher tone than his Italian counterpart, he said Russia had a choice - to align itself with the US and like-minded nations, or with Mr Assad, Iran and the militant group Hezbollah.
Mr Tillerson said it was unclear whether Russia had failed to take its obligations in Syria seriously, or whether it was was incompetent, but he said the distinction "doesn't much matter to the dead".
He said another chemical weapons attack could not be allowed to happen, adding: "It is clear to us the reign of the Assad family is coming to an end."
Mr Johnson had seen the G7 summit as a game-changing moment and had called for new sanctions to be imposed on Syrian military figures and Russian military individuals responsible for backing them.
But the question of added sanctions had barely been mentioned in the meetings, according to French foreign minister Jean-Marc Ayrault.
The outcome has fallen well short of that, with the countries agreeing there could be no Syrian peace deal with Mr Assad in power.
However, it was unclear how the group of seven nations expected Mr Assad's departure to be brought about.
It comes ahead of a visit by US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson to Moscow - and after G7 foreign ministers rejected UK Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson's calls to broaden sanctions against Russia and Syria.
Pressure has been mounting on Russia to end its support for Syrian leader Bashar al Assad following the US missile attack on a Syrian airbase, carried out in retaliation for a chemical weapons attack blamed on the president's regime - something it denies.
However, at a news conference at the close of the summit, Italian foreign minister Angelino Alfano said Russia must not be "pushed into a corner" over Syria.
Mr Tillerson, who is heading to Moscow to work on "a solution which will deliver a lasting political settlement" in Syria, has raised fresh expectations of aggressive military action against the country and any other repressive regimes.
Speaking in a tougher tone than his Italian counterpart, he said Russia had a choice - to align itself with the US and like-minded nations, or with Mr Assad, Iran and the militant group Hezbollah.
Mr Tillerson said it was unclear whether Russia had failed to take its obligations in Syria seriously, or whether it was was incompetent, but he said the distinction "doesn't much matter to the dead".
He said another chemical weapons attack could not be allowed to happen, adding: "It is clear to us the reign of the Assad family is coming to an end."
Mr Johnson had seen the G7 summit as a game-changing moment and had called for new sanctions to be imposed on Syrian military figures and Russian military individuals responsible for backing them.
But the question of added sanctions had barely been mentioned in the meetings, according to French foreign minister Jean-Marc Ayrault.
The outcome has fallen well short of that, with the countries agreeing there could be no Syrian peace deal with Mr Assad in power.
However, it was unclear how the group of seven nations expected Mr Assad's departure to be brought about.
Stockholm truck attack suspect 'confesses to terrorist crime'
The Stockholm truck attack suspect has admitted committing a terrorist crime, his lawyer has said.
He told a court that Rakhmat Akilov, 39, had confessed to deliberately driving the stolen beer lorry into crowds along Drottninggatan in the Swedish capital.
Four people were killed and another 15 injured in the attack on 7 April.
Johan Eriksson, defending Akilov, said "His position is that he admits to a terrorist crime and accepts therefore that he will be detained."
The rest of the court hearing was held behind closed doors, with the suspect having entered the court with a green sweater over his head.
The arrest warrant of a second suspect held over the attack has been revoked, prosecutors said on Tuesday.
He will not be released due to an earlier decision that he should be expelled from Sweden.
On Monday, Akilov's request for his state-appointed lawyer to be replaced with a Sunni Muslim was denied.
He told a court that Rakhmat Akilov, 39, had confessed to deliberately driving the stolen beer lorry into crowds along Drottninggatan in the Swedish capital.
Four people were killed and another 15 injured in the attack on 7 April.
Johan Eriksson, defending Akilov, said "His position is that he admits to a terrorist crime and accepts therefore that he will be detained."
The rest of the court hearing was held behind closed doors, with the suspect having entered the court with a green sweater over his head.
The arrest warrant of a second suspect held over the attack has been revoked, prosecutors said on Tuesday.
He will not be released due to an earlier decision that he should be expelled from Sweden.
On Monday, Akilov's request for his state-appointed lawyer to be replaced with a Sunni Muslim was denied.
Anger as 539 council bosses paid more than PM Theresa May
At least 2,300 council employees in England and Wales are earning six-figure salaries, according to research from the TaxPayers' Alliance.
The group, which campaigns for smaller government and lower taxes, claims the number of public sector workers being paid in excess of £100,000 a year is increasing.
It said 539 of these employees received packages worth more than £150,000 in 2015/16 - more than Prime Minister Theresa May.
That group saw an increase of 53 compared to the previous year.
John O'Connell, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said the high pay levels are "disappointing" given council tax bills are increasing and local services are being cut.
"Despite many in the public sector facing a much-needed pay freeze to help bring the public finances under control, many town hall bosses are continuing to pocket huge remuneration packages, with the number of people on six-figure deals actually going up since last year," he said.
"There are talented people in the public sector who are trying to deliver more for less, but the sheer scale of these packages raises serious questions about efficiency and priorities."
Southwark Council in London was the local authority which had the most employees on six-figure salaries - with 44 staff taking home more than £100,000 a year.
The figures also reveal Dave Smith, the former chief executive of Sunderland City Council, was the local government employee with the largest total pay package in 2015/16.
He received £625,570 - including a pay-off worth £185,470 and pension contributions of £331,414.
The TaxPayers' Alliance warned its figure of 2,314 six-figure earners was "likely to be an understatement" because councils present their remuneration data inconsistently.
Councillor Claire Kober, who chairs the Local Government Association's resources board, said councils are "committed to providing value for money to taxpayers" - and incoming chief executives are being paid considerably less than their predecessors.
But she added: "It is important that the right people with the right skills and experience are retained to deliver this work.
"The pay of senior council staff is set by politically proportionate committees of elected councillors and is open to a high level of scrutiny and democratic accountability as a result."
A spokesman for the Department of Communities and Local Government said: "Whilst it's a matter for individual local authorities, ministers have been clear that they expect them to show restraint from excessive pay rises, especially when it comes to senior staff.
"We've taken steps to make sure councils are more transparent on how they set pay and can be held accountable by local residents."
The group, which campaigns for smaller government and lower taxes, claims the number of public sector workers being paid in excess of £100,000 a year is increasing.
It said 539 of these employees received packages worth more than £150,000 in 2015/16 - more than Prime Minister Theresa May.
That group saw an increase of 53 compared to the previous year.
John O'Connell, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said the high pay levels are "disappointing" given council tax bills are increasing and local services are being cut.
"Despite many in the public sector facing a much-needed pay freeze to help bring the public finances under control, many town hall bosses are continuing to pocket huge remuneration packages, with the number of people on six-figure deals actually going up since last year," he said.
"There are talented people in the public sector who are trying to deliver more for less, but the sheer scale of these packages raises serious questions about efficiency and priorities."
Southwark Council in London was the local authority which had the most employees on six-figure salaries - with 44 staff taking home more than £100,000 a year.
The figures also reveal Dave Smith, the former chief executive of Sunderland City Council, was the local government employee with the largest total pay package in 2015/16.
He received £625,570 - including a pay-off worth £185,470 and pension contributions of £331,414.
The TaxPayers' Alliance warned its figure of 2,314 six-figure earners was "likely to be an understatement" because councils present their remuneration data inconsistently.
Councillor Claire Kober, who chairs the Local Government Association's resources board, said councils are "committed to providing value for money to taxpayers" - and incoming chief executives are being paid considerably less than their predecessors.
But she added: "It is important that the right people with the right skills and experience are retained to deliver this work.
"The pay of senior council staff is set by politically proportionate committees of elected councillors and is open to a high level of scrutiny and democratic accountability as a result."
A spokesman for the Department of Communities and Local Government said: "Whilst it's a matter for individual local authorities, ministers have been clear that they expect them to show restraint from excessive pay rises, especially when it comes to senior staff.
"We've taken steps to make sure councils are more transparent on how they set pay and can be held accountable by local residents."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)