Sir Cliff Richard has confirmed he is taking legal action against the BBC and South Yorkshire Police over live coverage of a police raid at his home.
The singer said in a statement he had instructed his lawyers to start formal proceedings to determine whether or not the behaviour of the broadcaster and police was "justified and proportionate".
The 75-year-old said his life was "effectively turned upside down" and his reputation "was unnecessarily damaged" after officers investigating claims of historical sex offences were filmed searching his Berkshire apartment back in 2014, leading to him being publicly named.
While the star acknowledged the police had to properly investigate allegations, he said "questions need to be answered" by them and the BBC over the initial handling of the case.
Sir Cliff was never arrested or charged and last month the case was dismissed on grounds of insufficient evidence.
Both the BBC and South Yorkshire Police have apologised to the entertainer.
Sir Cliff also called for police to follow guidelines in not naming suspects before they were charged save for "exceptional circumstances".
He said: "I chose not to comment during the active investigation for obvious reasons, but having suffered the experience that I have, I firmly believe that privacy should be respected and that police guidelines are there to be followed.
"That means that, save in exceptional circumstances, people should never be named unless and until they are charged.
"As everybody has accepted there were no such 'exceptional circumstances' in my case."
It has been reported the damages being sought by Sir Cliff as a result of his ordeal are in the region of £1m.
Explaining the reason for taking action, Sir Cliff said: "It is important not only for me personally but much more widely.
"My life was effectively turned upside down and my reputation, worldwide, was unnecessarily damaged. I would not want the same to happen to others whether in the public eye or not.
"Whilst the police of course need to properly investigate allegations made to them, it is clear to me that questions need to be answered by both the police and the BBC about their initial handling of my matter, which has rightly been condemned from so many quarters, including the Home Affairs Select Committee, the broader Press, and, even the Police themselves."
The BBC released a statement in June saying it was sorry that Sir Cliff had "suffered distress".
It said: "The BBC's responsibility is to report fully stories that are in the public interest. Police investigations into prominent figures in public life are, of course, squarely in the public interest, which is why they have been reported by all news organisations in this country.
"Once the South Yorkshire Police had confirmed the investigation and Sir Cliff Richard's identity and informed the BBC of the timing and details of the search of his property, it would neither have been editorially responsible nor in the public interest to choose not to report fully the investigation into Sir Cliff Richard because of his public profile.
"The BBC, at every stage, reported Sir Cliff's full denial of the allegations."
It said the Home Affairs Select Committee had said the BBC had done "nothing wrong" in its handling of the story, and said that issues of anonymity were ultimately for Parliament.
No comments:
Post a Comment